CursorvsCodex

Which agent to use

Cursor vs Codex

Cursor and Codex overlap because both can edit a repo without you typing every line. They split as soon as you ask where you want to be while that happens.

Updated October 16, 2026 · 4 min read

Interactive tool

Which agent fits your work?

What do you want from the agent?

Where do you want to review the work?

How many sessions at once?

Editor versus terminal agent
CursorCodex
ProductEditor and agentsOpenAI CLI
SessionLocal database, CLI, Cloud~/.codex/sessions
Diff inside the IDEYesNo. The diff is git’s
Resume in dokicursor-agent -p --resume or the APIcodex exec resume
ModelWhichever Cursor’s plan includesOpenAI
Editor has to be openNo, if you use the CLI or APINo. The session is enough

Stay in Cursor when the file matters

If the change is judged by looking at the screen — spacing, an empty state, a line of copy — the editor shortens the loop. Cursor’s agent sees what you have open and the diff is accepted there. doki does not pull you out of that habit: when the question is “should I push?”, it shows up in the Inbox and the answer goes back to Cursor.

The API path is for not bringing the window forward. It is described in Cursor vs doki.

Hand the task to Codex when the goal is the outcome

Codex fits assignments you can describe in a sentence and check with tests or with git, not with the mouse on a component. The session stays on disk even if you close the lid, and doki resumes it when needed.

The limit is any terminal’s limit: the editor’s visual context is not there. If the work is fine interface detail, Cursor usually leads. If it is behavior, Codex competes evenly with Claude.

Running them in parallel

Give them different worktrees. Cursor can keep the app folder and Codex the API folder. Ports do not clash and each .env is a copy. When they finish, one can review the other’s diff, or you do it from doki’s verdict.

Several agents explains the shared status. There is no Cursor plugin required for Codex, or the reverse.

Accounts that do not mix

Cursor’s plan does not turn Codex on, and an OpenAI account does not open the editor. doki is an optional third piece. Installing it does not migrate chats from one side to the other.

Keys you add in Connections stay in the Mac Keychain.

Frequently asked questions

Does Cursor include Codex?

No. Cursor has its own agents, in the app, the CLI, and the cloud. Codex is OpenAI’s CLI. doki talks to both.

Can I review in Cursor what Codex wrote?

Yes. You open the branch in Cursor when you want to read the diff slowly. doki may already have told you that the Codex session finished.

Which one do I leave running overnight?

Either, ideally in a worktree and with Guard on for anything that is not reversible. On a Mac mini or a VPS the path is SSH, described in the remote machines guide.

Does doki pick the winning model?

No. You assign the work and compare the diff. doki keeps that comparison from depending on watching two windows.

Never leave an agent waiting.

doki pulls Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and the other agents you already use into one Inbox, on your Mac, your iPhone and your servers.

See pricing →